EASTERN DISTRICT CLERK FRAUD

HENCEFORTH, I TAKE THE ACTION AS DESCRIBED BELOW...

ON THE 14TH OF DECEMBER I HARDCOPY MAIL THE SUBPOENA AND THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. TO JUDGE REYES, CERTIFIED AND PRIORITY.

ON THE 15 OF DECEMBER, THE CLERKS RECEIVE THE DOCUMENTS. THEY FALSIFY THE RECORDS TO INDICATE THEM RECEIVING IT ON THE 19TH WHEN THEABOVE.Y RECEIVED IT ON THE 15TH.. VIEW THE DOCUMENTS ABOVE THAT SHOW THEM RECEIVING ON THE 15TH AND CLAIMING IT WAS FILED ON THE 19TH...

12-09-2022 WAS THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND 12-11-2022 WAS THE SUBPOENA. EVIDENCE PROVIDED AS TO THEIR ELECTRONIC FILING TO THE JUDGES

SUPPOSEDLY THE JUDGE WRITES AN ORDER ON 12-23-2022 THAT WAS APPARENTLY WRITEN BY THE CLERK AS SHOWN ABOVE. THERE ARE MANY ISSUES WITH THIS ORDER. FOR ONE, THERE IS NO WAY OF KNOWING IF THE JUDGE ACTUALLY WROTE THIS ORDER. THERE IS NO SECURITY WHATSOEVER REGARDING THIS SIGNATURE.  PAGE 2 STATES  " COMPLAINS " WHEN THERE IS NO COMPLAINT.  SUCH A CHARACTERIZATION IS AN INSULT INFERRING EMOTIONAL FOUNDATION OR PERSONAL OPINION WHEN THERE IS NONE. THERE IS FACTUAL FRAUD, DESTRUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, DELAY OF DOCUMENTS AND FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS. THE JUDGE WRITES AN ORDER FOR FUTURE FILINGS TO BE MAILED WHEN IN FACT SUCH SUBPOENA WAS DESTROYED AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FILING DATE WAS FALSIFIED. THE PLANNED FILINGS COMMENT IS IN REGARDS TO ME HAVING TO DO THE FEDERAL COMPLAINT 22 CV 7815 TO COUNTER THE DEFENDANTS TRYING TO PUT ME IN JAIL VIA FRAUDULENT BASIS AND HENCEFORTH I CANNOT RESPOND TO THEIR FILINGS... ON THIS CASE AT THIS TIME SINCE I WAS WORKING ON THE FEDERAL COMPLAINT IN MY DEFENSE.

WHAT IS HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS ORDER, IT STATES THAT I INDICATED THAT I SENT SEVERAL SUBPOENAS TO THE COURT OF WHICH I DID NOT AND STATES ( PRESUMABLY SO ORDERED ) . WELL, SINCE A PRO SE CANNOT ISSUE A SUBPOENA AND SHOULD BE ABLE TO, THE PRO SE HAS TO FILL OUT THE SUBPOENA AND FILE WITH REQEUST TO BE ORDERED BY THE COURT. THERE IS NO " PRESUMPTION " AS CLAIMED AND THEIR ASSERTION THAT I AM PRESUMING IS TOTALLY BASELESS WITHOUT MERIT . I PRESUME NOTHING. I REQUEST WITH EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT AS REQUIRED OF WHICH SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED SINCE THRE SHOULD BE NO REQUEST FOR COURT SIGNATURE.  AN ATTORNEY DOES NOT NEED A COURT SIGNATURE FOR SUCH SUBPOENA. THE SMALL PARAGRAPH GOES ON TO STATE THAT THE BOX.COM ACCOUNT HAS BEEN CHECKED AGAIN AND THERE ARE NO SUBPOENAS THEREIN....WELL I NEVER STATED ANYWHERE THAT I FILED SUBPOENAS PLURAL AND WHY DOES THE DROPBOX NOT HAVE THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION EITHER ? WHERE IS THE HARDCOPY SUBPOENA SENT TO THE JUDGES IN THE SAME ENVELOPE AS THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WHICH WAS FALSIFIED AS TO FILING DATE AS SHOWN ABOVE ? IT SIMPLY MAKES NO SENSE TO ORDER ME TO SEND TO REYES HARDCOPY DOCUMENTS TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM WHEN SUCH HARDCOPY SUBPOENA WAS DESTROYED AND THE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FILING DATE WAS FALSIFIED.

AS CAN BE SSEN IN THE LEDGER ABOVE, AT 6: 49 PM ON DECEMBER 29, 2022 THIS CASE WAS NOWHERE TO BE FOUND ON PACER. VIEW PACER RECORDS. THE CLERKS CLAIM THAT IT WAS  ENTERED ON THE 29TH HOWEVER, ON THE 29TH THERE WAS NO SUCH FILING AS CAN BE SEEN ABOVE. IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE 30TH THAT THE CASE WAS ENTERED WHICH WAS 8 DAYS LATER WHEN UPLOADING TO PACER IS IMMEDIATE AND ACCORDING TO NORTHERN DISTRICT CLERKS , THE COMPLA HERE IT IS 8 DAYS...INT IS NORMALLY UPLOADED TO PACER WITHIN ONLY ONE DAY !

" NO THEY DON'T NEED TO TELL ME ANYTHING ABOUT YOUR DOCUMENTS BECAUSE I DIDNT INQUIRE ABOUT YOUR DOCUMENTS... "

PRO SE CLERKS DID NOT RETURN MESSAGES LEFT FOR THEM