JUDGE REYES, GONZALES AND SANNES IGNORE A SUBPOENA AND LETTERS FOR APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS REGARDING SERVICE UPON MARGARET INGOGLIA. ACS FIRST ACCEPTS SERVICE, THEN THEY REJECT SERVICE WHILE SHE WAS UNDER THEIR JURISDICTION IN THEIR FACILITY UNDER " ADDRESS CONFIDENTIAL. " MEANWHILE, ACS PROVIDES TO ME HER ADDRESS IN THE UNDERLYING ACS CASE IN AN EMAIL. WHILE THIS IS OCCURRING, THE JUDGE AND ACS ARE ISSUING ORDERS OF PROTECTION AND NOT SERVING THEM / INFORMING ME OF THEIR ISSUANCE, EVEN UPON MY REQUESTS. SINCE I KNEW THIS MAY BE A TRAP, I TRIED IN VAIN TO REACH OUT TO THE JUDGES REGARDING THE SERVICE OF MARGARET INGOGLIA,NOT JUST FOR CASE 22 CV 5416 BUT FOR 22 CV 6775 WHERE SHE IS A DEFENDANT. THE JUDGES ORDER SERVICE OF THE DEFENDANTS OF THE 22 CV 6775 BY A CERTAIN DATE AND I AM LEFT WITH NO OPTION BUT TO USE THE ADDRESS THAT ACS HAD GIVEN ME AND HAVE HER SERVED BY A LICENSED PROCESS SERVER. WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 30 DAYS I GET A CALL FROM A DETECTIVE THAT I AM WANTED AND TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WHILE REFUSING TO INFORM ME OF WHAT THE ISSUE IS. MARILYN RICHTER WHOM IS REPRESENTING ACS ALSO PLAYS DUMB AND KNOWS NOTHING. I TAKE ACTION AND FILE A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND SUBPOENA ON CASE NUMBER 22 CV 5416 REGARDING THIS MATTER AND THE CLERKS DESTROY THE FILINGS WHILE THE JUDGES IGNORE WHATEVER ELSE I ATTEMPT TO FILE REGARDING THE SITUATION. THE DEFENDANTS TOOK SUCH ACTION TO HAVE ME ARRESTED ON A CASE THAT INVOLVES MY FILING TO EXPOSE AND RECOUP A 26 BILLION DOLLAR FRAUD UPON THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BY ACS / ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDRENS SERVICES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK SINCE ACS DOES NOT LEGALLY EXIST. JUDGE REYES HANDLES THE MATTER OF THE CLERKS DESTROYING MY ELECTRONIC AND MAIILED HARDCOPY FILINGS BY ORDERING ME TO MAIL ALL FILINGS WHICH MAKES NO SENSE WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY IGNORING MY ECF APPLICATION SINCE MARCH OF 2022. SINCE I AM WANTED, THE JUDGE ASSISTS THE DEFENDANTS BY REQUIRING ME TO MAIL DOCUMENTS WHICH THEN PUTS ME AT A CERTAIN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE WEEK CONSISTENTLY TO FILE UPON MY FEDERAL CASES AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS WHOM ARE TRYING TO PHYSICALLY ARREST ME IN THEIR OWN DEFENSE. SO FIRST WE HAVE A SITUATION WHERE ACS ACCEPTS SERVICE FOR INGOGLIA, THEN REJECTS IT, THEN PROVIDES ME HER ADDRESS WHICH THEY ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO BECAUSE OF ADDRESS CONFIDENTIAL, ISSUE WITH THE ACS A SECRET ORDER OF PROTECTION, INFORM NYPD OF THE SERVICE OF THE ORDER OF PROTECTION THAT WAS NOT SERVED, THE JUDGE IGNORES THE SERVICE ISSUE UPON INGOGLIA, ORDERS HER SERVICE, I DO SO UPON THE ADDRESS ACS PROVIDED WITH A LICENSED PROCESS SERVER, THEN THEY , THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEFENDANTS TRY TO ARREST ME FOR DOING SO WILE THE JUDGE ORDERS ME TO FILE MY DOCUMENTS UPON 4 CASES VIA MAILING, IGNORING ECF APPLICATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS SO THAT THE DEFENDANTS CAN APPREHEND ME UPON MY TRIP TO THE POST OFFICE,